containers

Will Container Carrier Lines Return to Normal Post-Pandemic?

The current breakthrough for COVID-19 vaccines of Pfizer-BioNTech and alike are certainly diverting the world’s attention to logistics of how will it all be moved especially with current news of facing challenges and difficulties of movement.

The world’s wider media and general population may be in for a shock when they cast their eyes to the sectors entrusted to grease the world’s economy by moving goods and parts to far flung locations.

The current state of the container market is one of dysfunction, bordering on complete chaos. Supply chains have been stretched to near breaking points by the unprecedented vitality in demand swings, the final tells being numerous port congestion notices popping up in almost every single continent, from Sydney to Bilbao and many places in between.

Some notable container ports which have recently been subjected to congestion surcharges include: Fuzhou (China), Auckland (New Zealand), Sydney (Australia), Sudan & Conakry (Africa), Aden (Middle East), Bilbao (Spain), United Kingdom & Los Angeles / Long Beach (USA).

The industry has to certainly be commended for coping as well as it has with the unexpected demand surge, however the trade off has been longer lead-times and massively inflated freight rates as the world scrambles for the few available containers, which have become a precious commodity.

It’s no wonder that the ocean-side supply chain has fallen into a point of no repair as it has simply not been designed to cope with the ‘Black Swan’ events, such as the current pandemic that we are living in. A glut of capacity (either ships or containers), will have no choice but to be faced with lower prices. Ocean carriers, therefore are more on the watch than ever to synchronise supply and demand as best as they can, however not daring to risk a strategy to cater for highly unlikely scenarios.

Often, they get it right but also most of the time not, however generally the imbalances are within reasonable degrees from the equilibrium line. Investing in expensive assets such as ships will always be a gamble because shipowners do not have advance knowledge of the conditions in which those assets will operate. It is believed that over the 20+ years lifecycle there will be more good years than bad, but every new influx has the potential to destabilise the market, one way or another. It is also cumulative so that a run of misjudgements compounds the over/ under supply situation.

The current issue at hand has less to do with there being insufficient numbers of ships or containers but rather an inability to get them where they are needed in a timely fashion. Carriers have been throwing capacity back into the market, but landslides bottlenecks and long queues outside of ports all point to an infrastructure that cannot cope with sudden big peaks in activity.

The situation does not look like it will ease anytime in the near future or even when the demand curve flattens or even when container manufacturers have added sufficient new stocks.

Amidst the numerous bottlenecks, carriers are doing quite well. The only impediment to further freight rate inflation at current appears to be fear of regulatory retribution. Conditions are ripe for further gains, but twice recently carriers have cancelled planned GRIS (general rate increases) in the high-flying Transpacific market.

Governments certainly may have the power to suppress pricing models and dictate decisions, but they are unable to force carriers to invest. Even if there is currently an unofficial ceiling for freight rates, lines will still be very profitable at the current levels and would like them to remain so for as long as possible.

In the long run, what incentives are there for lines to spend their money to make the supply chain more resilient to future demands shocks?

In an imaginary scenario, one could consider the following two options from a carrier’s perspective:

a. Invest heavily into new ships and equipment. This could potentially improve operational efficiency but carries a high likelihood that the market would ‘reward’ you with lower freight rates.

b. Freeze all investments. This would most likely further disrupt supply chains and create animosity with customers, potentially save money and increase the probability of sustained highly profitable freight rates.

We at DTL Sourcing are hoping that shipping and logistic prices will resume and go back to normal after Chinese New Year 2021!

Signing Ceremony of the RCEP

The Formation of RCEP: APAC Creation of World’s Largest Trading Bloc

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is comprised of 10 Southeast Asian countries as well as China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. This new founded pact is seen as an extension of China’s influence in the overall region.

The deal currently excludes the US, which withdrew from a rival APAC trade pact back in 2017. Also, President Trump pulled the American nation out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TTP) shortly after taking office.

Negotiations over the new RCEP deal started in 2012 and was fully completed and signed this November 2020 on the sidelines of a meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).

Map of RCEP members

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is comprised of 10 Southeast Asian countries as well as China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. This new founded pact is seen as an extension of China’s influence in the overall region.

The deal currently excludes the US, which withdrew from a rival APAC trade pact back in 2017. Also, President Trump pulled the American nation out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TTP) shortly after taking office.

Negotiations over the new RCEP deal started in 2012 and was fully completed and signed this November 2020 on the sidelines of a meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).

The RCEP isn’t as thorough and extensive, and doesn’t cut tariffs as cohesively as the TPP’s successor, however many analysts believe that the RCEP’s mere size makes it even more significant.

While Mainland China already has numerous bilateral trade agreements, this is the first time it has signed up to a regional multilateral trade pact.

There are a few reasons that member-ing countries want this deal. For starters, world leaders hope that the pact would help spur recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. The negotiations had been going on for 8 years and for many, shines a ray of light and hope for participating nations. The agreement is seen by many as a victory of multilateralism, and free trade.

Initially, India had also been a part of the negotiations, however pulled out last year over big concerns that lower tariffs could potentially harm local producers. Signatories of the deal claimed that the door remains open for India to join the pact at a future date.

Members of the RCEP man up for nearly one third of the world’s population and account for almost 29% of global gross domestic product.

The newfound RCEP will be larger than both the US-Mexico-Canada agreement and the European Union.

So what will the RCEP do? It’s expected to eliminate tariff on imports within the next 20 years. It also includes provisions on intellectual property, telecommunications, financial & professional services and e-commerce.

The new ‘rules of origin’ which officially define where a product is produced may have the biggest impact. There are already many member states with free trade agreements (FTA) with one another, but there are limitations. The existing FTA can be quite complicated to use compared to RCEP, businesses with global supply chains may face tariffs even within an FTA because their products contain components that are made elsewhere.

For example, a product made in China that contains Australian parts, may face tariffs elsewhere in the ASEAN free trade zone. However, under RCEP, parts from any member nation would be treated equally which may give companies in RCEP participating countries an incentive to look within the trade region for suppliers, therefore boosting the economy.

The RCEP deal could increase global national income by hundreds of billions annually by 2030, and add towards the economy of its member states. Some analysts believe that the deal is likely to benefit China, Japan and South Korea more than other member states as there may be some interesting trade and tariff dynamics to be seen for these countries.

This deal can have a large scale impact towards sourcing and trading: if there are no taxes between the participating nations, it could equal to more business, more businesses looking to produce in China, meaning a substantial growth for our company and yours. DTL Sourcing can be your intermediary, with many years of experience and a large network in China, get in touch today to discuss your business needs.

More information on RCEP official website www.rcepsec.org

DTL Sourcing - The Future of PPE

The Future of Personal Protective Equipment

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the world has become completely dependent on personal protective equipment, or ‘PPE’. Most of these essential gear, from gowns, masks to goggles, are produced in China. Experts from Western countries say that this foreign dependence may become problematic.

Alarmed at China’s stranglehold over PPE supplies, countries around the world have started to set up their own factories to cope with the ongoing pandemic and possible outbreaks of the future.

When the outbreak eventually subsides, factories in the West may struggle to survive. China has already laid the groundwork to dominate the PPE market for years to come.

As a courtesy from the Chinese government, factory owners get cheap land and subsidies & loans are plentiful. Chinese hospitals are often told to purchase locally, giving China’s mass suppliers a captive and vast market.

Once a vaccine becomes available, demand will likely drop. Factories will cease operations however Chinese companies are likely to have the lowest costs by far and be best positioned for the next global outbreak.

The Chinese have been very successful in constructing a global PPE dominance with supply-chain command and control. China’s strong grip on the world market is a testament to its drive to dominate important cogs in the global industrial machine.

goggles surgical mask nitrile gloves china

Looking back into recent times, China’s leaders had worried that the country had depended too much on foreign sources for industries such as aviation, microchips and medical supplies. As a result of this, they have utilized subsidies, economic targets and the likes to emerge as a global powerhouse in these important industries.

When Chinese leaders grew concerned about pollution and dependence on foreign oil, they assisted local Chinese makers of wind turbines, solar panels, high-speed rail equipment to smash their overseas competition. They have taken similar steps to dominate industries of the future such as the next generation of wireless data, better known as 5G.

The state’s heavy involvement in its economy has led to mass graft and waste which could potentially slow China’s growth. But the policies have mostly proved effective in building industries that can withstand losses and tough foreign competitions. Medical supplies could be similar. There could be a massive consolidation when the epidemic passes, it could be the same dynamics as in green energy, 5G and high-speed rail.

Before the pandemic, China had already exported more medical masks, respirators and protective garments than the rest of the world combined. The capital Beijing’s COVID-19 response has only added to that dominance. It increased mask production nearly 12-fold in February alone this year. It can now make 150 tons per day of the specialised fabric used for masks, that is fives times what China could make before the outbreak, and 15 times the output of U.S companies even after they ramped up production this spring.

American companies have been somewhat reluctant to make big investments in fabric manufacturing because they have concerns that the mask demand would only be temporary. It’s a mistake to simply assume that the market will disappear when we can’t foresee if the epidemic will disappear or simply become the new-norm that we have to get used to.

From March through May of 2020, China exported 70.6 billion masks. The entire world produced about 20 billion all of 2019, with China accounting for half. Other countries now want self-reliance: earlier in the pandemic, China often decided which countries received crucial supplies and demanded public thanks in exchange.

France pledged in March to produce homegrown masks and respirators by the end of 2020 and the U.S had begun a push for the federal government to buy American-made pharmaceuticals and medical supples. As always, China had a head start.

3D US Import Tarrifs

Impact of Biden Victory on U.S-Chinese Business

There is newfound optimism for U.S businesses in China due to the President-elect Joe Biden’s win last month. The Biden administration could be a positive to the overall stability of the environment, the stability of the overall relationship.

Tensions between China and the U.S especially regarding trade under the Trump administration had escalated severely, which took a tough approach to addressing longstanding complaints about unfair business practices in the Chinese state-dominated system. Both nations applied tariffs on billions of dollars’ worth of goods from each other. The White House subsequently put Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei and similar companies on a blacklist that prevents them from buying important parts from key U.S suppliers.

Under a Biden administration it seems more likely to not expect more direct tariffs but rather to anticipate new legislations relating to the newfound U.S leadership to working with other countries to put pressure on trade relations with China.

China’s economic recovery from the COVID-19 epidemic whilst the U.S is still struggling to control the outbreak is also helping businesses. With just over a month left of 2020, many businesses anticipate their 2020 revenue would exceed those of last year’s. A vast number of American companies with manufacturing operations in China intend to keep production in the country in the next three years with only a few firms planning to move manufacturing overseas.

The COVID-19 pandemic first emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan late 2019. The disease accelerated its spread around the Chinese Lunar New Year, forcing the majority of the country to shut down temporarily. Whilst the outbreak was kept under control by the end of Q1 in China, the virus had turned into a worldwide pandemic hitting major economies in North America and Europe.

While there is increased optimism on the horizon for U.S business sentiment in China, some of these U.S companies have concerns on potential exit bans, detentions and other restrictions on their workforce.

In the past few years, the Chinese state-run government has released new policies for improving the foreign business environment but critics worry that implementation seems un-coordinated and have a forced technology transfer, severe lack of intellectual property protected and limited market access remain big issues.

Biden and XI at White House in 2012